Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 30.12 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1969 c 828 s 7]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1974–2002 · leading case: Larson v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 210 F.R.D. 663 (D. Minnesota 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Larson v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 210 F.R.D. 663 (D. Minnesota 2002). · cites it 4× “For its part, the Defendant cites that portion of Section 30.12 of the Manual, which provides as follows: Precertification discovery should be structured to facilitate an early certification decision while furthering efficient and economical discovery on the merits.”

United States v. Reserve Mining Co., 394 F. Supp. 233 (D. Minnesota 1974). “Defendants’ discharge of water into the Dunka and Partridge Rivers without a permit is in violation of M.”

Simmons v. Kemp, 751 F. Supp. 815 (D. Minnesota 1990). “Haydock, Minnesota Practice, § 30.12 at 26 (Supp.1990). Plaintiffs conclude that rule 34 still governs the timing of discovery, and therefore, tenants’ access to documents is dependent on the discretion of the Court.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.