Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 300.03 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 301B.01]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1943–2019 · leading case: City of Saint Paul v. N. States Power Co., 462 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 1990).
City of Saint Paul v. N. States Power Co., 462 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. 1990). “03 (1988), which provides in part: A corporation may be organized to * * * furnish power for public use, and any work for supplying the public, by whatever means, with water, light, heat, or power, including all requisite subways, pipes, or other conduits * * *.”
Vill. of Blaine v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 12, 121 N.W.2d 183 (Minn. 1963). “*16 This case thus presents a genuine dispute as to the nature of the municipal franchise granted under § 300.03. In the course of the trial it will have to be determined whether the franchise rights here involved include all the territory within the municipal corporate limits…”
Robert J. Ihrke & Mary E. Ihrke v. N. States Power Co., a Minnesota Corp., 459 F.2d 566 (8th Cir. 1972). “Minn.Stat.Ann. § 300.03. Northern was granted gas and electricity franchises by the City of St.”
N. States Power Co. v. Oslund, 51 N.W.2d 808 (Minn. 1952). “01, when the taking of private property is authorized by law, it shall be acquired by eminent domain in the manner prescribed by c. 117, subject, however, to certain exceptions which have no application here.”
Minnesota Gas Co. v. Pub. Serv. Com., Etc., 394 F. Supp. 327 (D. Minnesota 1974). “” Section 300.-04 provides in part: “The state shall at all times have the right to supervise and regulate the business methods and management of any such corporation and from time to time to fix the compensation which it may charge or receive for its services.”
Country Club Dist. Serv. Co. v. Vill. of Edina, 8 N.W.2d 321 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 300.03 (Mason St. 1927, § 7432) (see Duluth Terminal Ry.”
U S West Commc'ns, Inc. v. City of Redwood Falls, 558 N.W.2d 512 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). “The city argues that despite enactment of the 1915 legislation, the legislature never repealed sections 300.03, 300.04, and 222.37, which purportedly continue to authorize municipal franchising and regulation of public corporations, including telephone companies.”
City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd, 932 N.W.2d 477 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019). “" Minn. Stat. §§ 300.03 -.04 (1996) contains language now referenced in Minn.”
City of Saint Paul v. N. States Power Co., 450 N.W.2d 599 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “Paul’s authority to demand that a franchise be obtained for the distribution of natural gas within the city is derived from Minn.Stat. § 300.03 (1984), which provides that: A corporation may be organized to * * * furnish power for public use, and any work for supplying the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.