Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 310. CORPORATIONS ORGANIZED TO ACQUIRE AND MANAGE PUBLIC LANDS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 310.05 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1947 c 218 s 1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–2016 · leading case: Staeheli v. City of St. Paul, 732 N.W.2d 298 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Staeheli v. City of St. Paul, 732 N.W.2d 298 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 6× “We note that section 310.05 was amended in April of 2005, after the conduct forming the basis of the license termination, but before the TISH board's decision.”
Miller v. City of Saint Paul, 363 N.W.2d 806 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 6× “Saint Paul Legislative Code § 310.05(1). Notice shall be written, served a reasonable time before the hearing, state the place, date, and time of the hearing, and state the issues or grounds on which the proposed revocation is based.”
Hymanson v. City of St. Paul, 329 N.W.2d 324 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “Paul, Minnesota, City Charter and Legislative Code § 310.05(7) (1981) provides: Where the provisions of any statute or ordinance require additional notice or hearing procedures, such provisions shall be complied with and shall supersede inconsistent provisions of these chapters.”
DeLite Outdoor Advert., Inc. v. City of St. Paul, 167 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (D. Minnesota 2001). · cites it 2× “Paul Legislative Code, § 310.05(c-l). This recommendation is not binding.”
Bal, Inc. v. City of St. Paul, 469 N.W.2d 341 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “, Legislative Code § 310.05(c-l) (1987). At the hearing, six citizens, most of whom resided in the Wa-basha Bar neighborhood, complained of fights and altercations, public intoxication, sexual acts, public urination and loitering near the Wabasha Bar.”
In the Matter of all Licenses Held by Pet Motortech, Inc., d/b/a Pet Auto Repair, for the premises at 44 Acker Street in St. Paul, Minnesota. (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “05(k) (2013) authorizes the city council to impose upon a licensee some or all of the costs of a contested hearing in any given case “if the position, claim or defense of the licensee was frivolous, arbitrary, or capricious.” Here, the city council articulated grounds for…”
— Minn. Stat. § 310.05(1) — 1 case
Miller v. City of Saint Paul, 363 N.W.2d 806 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Saint Paul Legislative Code § 310.05(1). Notice shall be written, served a reasonable time before the hearing, state the place, date, and time of the hearing, and state the issues or grounds on which the proposed revocation is based.”
— Minn. Stat. § 310.05(2) — 1 case
Miller v. City of Saint Paul, 363 N.W.2d 806 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Saint Paul Legislative Code § 310.05(1). Notice shall be written, served a reasonable time before the hearing, state the place, date, and time of the hearing, and state the issues or grounds on which the proposed revocation is based.”
— Minn. Stat. § 310.05(7) — 2 cases
Hymanson v. City of St. Paul, 329 N.W.2d 324 (Minn. 1983). “Paul, Minnesota, City Charter and Legislative Code § 310.05(7) (1981) provides: Where the provisions of any statute or ordinance require additional notice or hearing procedures, such provisions shall be complied with and shall supersede inconsistent provisions of these chapters.”
Miller v. City of Saint Paul, 363 N.W.2d 806 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Saint Paul Legislative Code § 310.05(1). Notice shall be written, served a reasonable time before the hearing, state the place, date, and time of the hearing, and state the issues or grounds on which the proposed revocation is based.”
— Minn. Stat. § 310.05(k) — 1 case
In the Matter of all Licenses Held by Pet Motortech, Inc., d/b/a Pet Auto Repair, for the premises at 44 Acker Street in St. Paul, Minnesota. (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “05(k) (2013) authorizes the city council to impose upon a licensee some or all of the costs of a contested hearing in any given case “if the position, claim or defense of the licensee was frivolous, arbitrary, or capricious.” Here, the city council articulated grounds for…”
— Minn. Stat. § 310.05(m) — 1 case
Staeheli v. City of St. Paul, 732 N.W.2d 298 (Minn. Ct. App. 2007). “We note that section 310.05 was amended in April of 2005, after the conduct forming the basis of the license termination, but before the TISH board's decision.”
— Minn. Stat. § 310.05(m)(i) — 1 case
In the Matter of all Licenses Held by Pet Motortech, Inc., d/b/a Pet Auto Repair, for the premises at 44 Acker Street in St. Paul, Minnesota. (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “05(k) (2013) authorizes the city council to impose upon a licensee some or all of the costs of a contested hearing in any given case “if the position, claim or defense of the licensee was frivolous, arbitrary, or capricious.” Here, the city council articulated grounds for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.