Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 323.15 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1997 c 174 art 12 s 68; 1998 c 262 s 12]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1953–1996 · leading case: Lyman Lumber Co. v. Three Rivers Co., 400 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
Lyman Lumber Co. v. Three Rivers Co., 400 N.W.2d 811 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “Jones and Bunn never formed a legal partnership, they were partners by estoppel pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 323.15. The court found that Moerke had no apparent authority to act for the partnership.”
Bedow v. Watkins, 552 N.W.2d 543 (Minn. 1996). “See Minn.Stat. § 323.15 (1994). 4 . Hetlund may be personally liable if Eldrid Realty is unable to answer the debt, but such a determination depends on Hetlund’s relationship with his company (e.”
Blumberg v. Palm, 56 N.W.2d 412 (Minn. 1953). “15, which provides in part: “When a person, by words spoken or written or by conduct, represents himself, or consents to another representing him to any one, as a partner in an existing partnership or with one or more persons not actual partners, he is liable to any such person…”
M.W. Ettinger, Inc. v. Anderson, 360 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 323.15, subd. 1 (1982). Furthermore, a representation will also bind any person who consents to the representation to the same extent as though they were partners in fact.”
— Minn. Stat. § 323.15(2) — 1 case
M.W. Ettinger, Inc. v. Anderson, 360 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Minn.Stat. § 323.15, subd. 1 (1982). Furthermore, a representation will also bind any person who consents to the representation to the same extent as though they were partners in fact.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.