Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 325.8013 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1978 [Renumbered 325D.51]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1979–1988 · leading case: Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'n, 294 N.W.2d 297 (Minn. 1980).
Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'n, 294 N.W.2d 297 (Minn. 1980). “If the contract provision is not per se illegal, Watonwan next argues that it is illegal under Minn.Stat. § 325.8013 (1978), which provides: “A contract, combination, or conspiracy between two or more persons in unreasonable restraint of trade or commerce is unlawful.”
Beer Wholesalers, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co., 426 N.W.2d 438 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Minn.Stat. § 325.8013 (1976) makes unlawful any “contract, combination, or conspiracy between two or more persons in unreasonable restraint of trade.”
Willis M. Duryea, Jr. v. The Third Nw. Nat'l Bank of Minneapolis, a Nat'l Banking Ass'n Bruce Winslow, John Doe & Mary Roe, 606 F.2d 823 (3rd Cir. 1979). “§ 1 ; Minnesota antitrust law, Minn. Stat.Ann. § 325.8013 (Supp.1979); Minnesota common law fraud and unjust enrichment; violation of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.”
Vasek v. Warren Grain & Seed Co., 353 N.W.2d 175 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “The complaint alleged that Cargill violated the antitrust provisions contained in Minn.Stat. § 325.8013 and that Cargill, along with Warren Grain, was liable for the price of grain delivered to Warren Grain.”
Hoffman v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota, 517 F. Supp. 564 (D. Minnesota 1981). “§ 325.8013 and decline to exercise pendent jurisdiction over the claim brought pursuant to Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.