Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 325D. RESTRAINT OF TRADE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 325D.165 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1998 c 315 s 13]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1994–1999 · leading case: DeRosier v. 5931 Bus. Trust, 870 F. Supp. 941 (D. Minnesota 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
DeRosier v. 5931 Bus. Trust, 870 F. Supp. 941 (D. Minnesota 1994). · cites it 8× “Louis County, Minnesota, alleges that the Defendants have violated the Plaintiffs common law trade name, the Lanham Act, the Minnesota Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 325D.165, by opening and operating a retail business, in the…”
Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Taylor, 21 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (D. Minnesota 1998). · cites it 2× “…require that plaintiffs mark be famous. It is enough under the Minnesota statute if plaintiffs mark is "well-known.’’ Minn.Stat. § 325D.165.”
Boat Dealers' All., Inc., a Florida Corp. v. Outboard Marine Corp., a Delaware Corp., 182 F.3d 619 (8th Cir. 1999). “69, and injury to business reputation in violation of Minn.Stat. § 325D.165. The District Court 1 granted OMC’s motion for summary judgment on all claims.”
Duluth News-Tribune, a Div. of Nw. Publications, Inc. v. Mesabi Publ'g Co., 84 F.3d 1093 (8th Cir. 1996). “State Claim: Dilution The Minnesota anti-dilution statute protects trademark owners from dilution of the distinctive quality of their marks notwithstanding the likelihood of confusion.”
Boat Dealers' v. Outboard Marine (8th Cir. 1999). “69, and injury to business reputation in violation of Minn. Stat. § 325D.165. The District Court1 granted OMC's motion for summary judgment on all claims.”
Ventura v. Titan Sports, Inc., 65 F.3d 725 (1995). “See Minn.Stat. § 325D.165 (Supp.1995) (1994 Amendment to Minnesota Unlawful Trade Practices Act); § 325D.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.