Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 325D.56 (2026)
Penalties For Violation
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§
Subdivision 1.Civil penalties.
Any person who is found to have violated sections 325D.49 to 325D.66, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $50,000. Any person who fails to comply with a final judgment or decree rendered by a court of this state issued for a violation of sections 325D.49 to 325D.66, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $100,000.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1981–1992 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Prods., Inc., 490 N.W.2d 888 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992).
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Alpine Air Prods., Inc., 490 N.W.2d 888 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). “Minn.Stat. § 325D.56, subd. 1 (1990). The court should consider the following factors in determining the size of a *897 civil penalty: (1) the good or bad faith of the defendant; (2) the injury to the public; (3) the defendant’s ability to pay; and (4) the desire to eliminate…”
Hoffman v. Delta Dental Plan of Minnesota, 517 F. Supp. 564 (D. Minnesota 1981). “is denied for the nonce, and its motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim for a civil penalty pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 325D.56 is granted. The parties have stipulated to certain facts for the purposes of the cross motion for summary judgment.”
State v. DeWitt, 389 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1986). “l(2)(a) (1984) and charging defendants with a felony under Minn.Stat. § 325D.56, subd. 2 (1984) and Minn.”
State v. Rupp, 393 N.W.2d 496 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “See Minn.Stat. § 325D.56, subd. 2 (1984). The trial court assigned a severity level of four to that offense, which was omitted from the Offense Severity Reference Table of the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines.”
State v. Mclaughlin & Schulz, Inc., 397 N.W.2d 9 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “See Minn.Stat. § 325D.56, subd. 2 (1984); see also Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.