Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 340.951 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1985 c 305 art 13 s 1; renumbered 340A.802]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1978–2018 · leading case: Wegan v. Vill. of Lexington, 309 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. 1981).
Wegan v. Vill. of Lexington, 309 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. 1981). “In each of these cases the plaintiffs failed either to serve timely notice of their dram shop claims or to initiate their actions within the statute of limitations set forth in Minn.Stat. § 340.951 (1980). Consequently, the district courts granted summary judgment or judgment on…”
Schulte v. Corner Club Bar, 544 N.W.2d 486 (Minn. 1996). “[2] This case actually arose under Minn.Stat. § 340.951 (1970) (now repealed), the predecessor of section 340A.”
Brenner v. Nordby, 306 N.W.2d 126 (Minn. 1981). “See Minn.Stat. § 340.951 (1980). The issue is whether the trial court erred by concluding that there were no genuine issues of material fact raised with respect to plaintiff’s claim that defendant was estopped to assert the defense.”
Hammerschmidt v. Moore, 274 N.W.2d 79 (Minn. 1978). “951, read as follows: "From and after July 1, 1969, every person who claims damages from any municipality owning and operating a municipal liquor store or from the licensee of any licensed liquor establishment for or on account of any injury within the scope of Minnesota…”
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post, 910 N.W.2d 9 (Minn. 2018). “on notice of a possible claim" under subdivision 2.”
Watson v. Stonewings on the Lake, 393 N.W.2d 518 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that plaintiffs had not brought the action within the two-year limitation period prescribed by Minn.Stat. § 340.951. We affirm. FACTS On August 28, 1983, Larry Watson was seriously injured when his…”
Kimberly L. Meyer, William Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 270, d/b/a Buffalo Am. Legion or Buffalo Am. Legion Post, & Am. Legion Post 270, Third Party v. Gretchen Root, Third Party (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “See Minn. Stat. § 340.951 (1984) (allowing actual notice to be measured by knowledge of a licensee’s insurer).”
— Minn. Stat. § 340.951(3) — 1 case
Wegan v. Vill. of Lexington, 309 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. 1981). “In each of these cases the plaintiffs failed either to serve timely notice of their dram shop claims or to initiate their actions within the statute of limitations set forth in Minn.Stat. § 340.951 (1980). Consequently, the district courts granted summary judgment or judgment on…”
— Minn. Stat. § 340.951(3)(1974) — 1 case
Wegan v. Vill. of Lexington, 309 N.W.2d 273 (Minn. 1981). “In each of these cases the plaintiffs failed either to serve timely notice of their dram shop claims or to initiate their actions within the statute of limitations set forth in Minn.Stat. § 340.951 (1980). Consequently, the district courts granted summary judgment or judgment on…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.