Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 352E.04 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Renumbered 176B.04]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Dependents of Ondler v. Peace Officers Benefit Fund, 289 N.W.2d 486 (Minn. 1980).
Dependents of Ondler v. Peace Officers Benefit Fund, 289 N.W.2d 486 (Minn. 1980). “Minn.Stat. § 352E.04 provides: *488 Upon certification to the governor by the administrator of any state or governmental subdivision employing peace officers that a peace officer employed by that state or governmental subdivision within this state has been killed in the line of…”
Johnson v. City of Plainview, 431 N.W.2d 109 (Minn. 1988). “” Minn.Stat. § 352E.04 (Supp.1985). The deaths of Johnson and Hardel qualify under this standard and entitle their dependents to benefits under the Fund.”
Kramer v. State, Peace Officers Benefit Fund, 380 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 1986). “Minn. Stat. § 352E.04 (1980) so states, and we so hold.”
In the Matter of a Pub. Saf. Officer Death Benefit for Eric William Groebner (Deceased) (Minn. 2026). “When we decided Kramer and Johnson in the 1980s, the Legislature had not defined “killed in the line of duty” in the death benefits statute, other than to exclude “deaths from natural causes” and “deaths that occur during employment for a private 26 employer.”
— Minn. Stat. § 352E.04(e) — 2 cases
Dependents of Ondler v. Peace Officers Benefit Fund, 289 N.W.2d 486 (Minn. 1980). “Minn.Stat. § 352E.04 provides: *488 Upon certification to the governor by the administrator of any state or governmental subdivision employing peace officers that a peace officer employed by that state or governmental subdivision within this state has been killed in the line of…”
Johnson v. City of Plainview, 431 N.W.2d 109 (Minn. 1988). “” Minn.Stat. § 352E.04 (Supp.1985). The deaths of Johnson and Hardel qualify under this standard and entitle their dependents to benefits under the Fund.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.