Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 372.04 (2026)

Order Setting Time Of Election

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If the names of at least 60 percent of those voting at the last preceding general election remain on the petition, the auditor, after filing the certificate, shall make, under official seal, and file in the auditor's office, an order setting the time for a special election upon the question of changing the county seat to the place designated in the petition, at least 20 but not more than 30 days after filing the certificate.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1975–1995 · leading case: Alexander v. City of St. Paul, 227 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 1975).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Alexander v. City of St. Paul, 227 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 9× “The basis of the revocation was § 372.04(G) of the city’s code, which provides: “It shall be grounds for rescinding or the denial of any motion *203 picture theater license granted under this ordinance if the licensee, owner, manager, lessee, any of the employees, or any person…”

Taxpayers' Choice Volunteer Comm. v. Roseau Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 903 F. Supp. 1301 (D. Minnesota 1995). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 372.04. The county seat will be moved to the location specified on the petition if 55 percent of all votes cast in the election favor the change.”

Op. Atty. Gen. 106e (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1995). · cites it 2× “273 amending Minn. Stat. § 372.04 . Standing alone, this change in wording would suggest a legislative intent to change the 60 percent requirement from a reference to the n_unLe; of signatures required, to a substantive requirement that the signatories actually be persons who…”

— Minn. Stat. § 372.04(G) — 1 case

Alexander v. City of St. Paul, 227 N.W.2d 370 (Minn. 1975). “The basis of the revocation was § 372.04(G) of the city’s code, which provides: “It shall be grounds for rescinding or the denial of any motion *203 picture theater license granted under this ordinance if the licensee, owner, manager, lessee, any of the employees, or any person…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.