Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 383C.056 (2026)

Inconsistent Acts Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All acts and parts of acts inconsistent with sections 383C.03 to 383C.056 are hereby repealed to the extent necessary to give effect to the provisions of sections 383C.03 to 383C.056.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1989–1989 · leading case: Schoen v. Cnty. of St. Louis, 448 N.W.2d 112 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Schoen v. Cnty. of St. Louis, 448 N.W.2d 112 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 14× “The Commissioner heard oral arguments on the case upon the request of the county which took exception to the decision of the AD. Agreeing with the AD’s recommendation, the Commissioner ordered that a veterans preference hearing be held.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.