Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 3C.13 (2026)
Legal Status Of Statutes
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any volume of Minnesota Statutes, supplement to Minnesota Statutes, and Laws of Minnesota certified by the revisor according to section 3C.11, subdivision 1, is prima facie evidence of the statutes contained in it in all courts and proceedings.
Revised Laws of Minnesota 1905, General Statutes of Minnesota 1913, General Statutes of Minnesota 1923, Mason's Minnesota Statutes 1927, and supplements, appendix and addenda, or added volumes to these publications are prima facie evidence of the statutes contained in them in all courts and proceedings.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2002–2017 · leading case: State v. Boecker, 893 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 2017).
State v. Boecker, 893 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 2017). “The Legislature has directed that any volume of the Laws of Minnesota, Minnesota Statutes, and the supplement to Minnesota Statutes that are prepared by the Revisor of Statutes are “prima facie evidence of the statutes contained in it in all courts and proceedings.”
Granville v. Minneapolis Pub. Schs., Special Sch. Dist. No. 1, 732 N.W.2d 201 (Minn. 2007). “In support of this argument, the district cites Minn. Stat. § 3C.13 (2006): “Any volume of Minnesota Statutes, supplement to Minnesota Statutes, and Laws of Minnesota certified by the revisor according to section 3C.”
Occhino v. Grover, 640 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). “See Minn. Stat. § 3C.13 (legal status of statutes).”
Ledden v. State, 686 N.W.2d 873 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). ““Any volume of Minnesota Statutes, supplement to Minnesota Statutes, and Laws of Minnesota certified by the revisor according to section 3C.”
State v. Wendorf, 814 N.W.2d 359 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). “Thus, although Minnesota Statutes and the supplements to Minnesota Statutes are prima facie evidence of the statutes, Minn.Stat. § 3C.13 (2010), they are not the law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.