Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 4. GOVERNOR
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 4.02 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1996 c 310 s 1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1974–2008 · leading case: City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2008). · cites it 14× “21(f) (Section 4.02). [4] This provision thus requires the incorporation of either a window or a mechanical ventilation system into the structure itself.”
Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of Chanhassen, 342 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 16× “The relevant sections of Ordinance 47 are these: Section 4.02, the "Definitions" section of the ordinance, which defines "Drive-In-Establishment" as follows: An establishment of the drive-in type is one which accomodates the patrons' automobiles, from which the occupants may…”
In Re Hennepin Cnty. 1986 Recycling Bond Litig., 540 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 4× “Section 4.02 deals with HERC's obligation to repay the loan and describes required payments to the Bond Fund, to the Sinking Fund, to the Reserve Fund, and to the Redemption Fund.”
State v. Brom, 463 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 1990). · cites it 2× “2 (1989), and the ALI Model Penal Code § 4.02(1) provide that evidence concerning a defendant's mental condition should be admissible at a criminal trial whenever it is relevant to prove that a defendant did or did not have the state of mind required for the *767 offense charged.”
Whitehill v. Seaway Port Auth. of Duluth, 349 N.W.2d 313 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 3× “See, Lease § 4.02. The tenant, however, unable to complete the facility with the financing available, defaulted in late 1974 and made no rental payments.”
Mesaba Aviation, Inc. v. Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Ass'n (In Re Mesaba Aviation, Inc.), 350 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2006). “The lending agreement for that financing provides, at § 4.02(i), (i) Labor. The Borrower shall have either (i) obtained Tentative Agreements with each of its labor unions, in each case on terms reasonably satisfactory to the Agent or (ii) imposed new terms with the labor union…”
Woodson v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local 292, 974 F. Supp. 1256 (D. Minnesota 1997). “” Agreement §’§ 4.02 and 4.03. Plaintiffs challenge the referral and hiring procedure provided for in the Agreement between the Union and the contractor defendants.”
Oberhelman v. Schultze, 371 F. Supp. 1089 (D. Minnesota 1974). “” City Code of Fairmont § 4.02(5). The Court finds that defendants did not abuse the broad discretion granted them as officials of the city in the denial of plaintiff’s application.”
R.L. Hexum & Assocs., Inc. v. Rochester Twp., Bd. of Supervisors, 609 N.W.2d 271 (Minn. Ct. App. 2000). “The township board made contemporaneous findings and addressed all of the relevant provisions in sections 4.02 and 5.08 of the interim ordinance.”
— Minn. Stat. § 4.02(1) — 1 case
State v. Brom, 463 N.W.2d 758 (Minn. 1990). “2 (1989), and the ALI Model Penal Code § 4.02(1) provide that evidence concerning a defendant's mental condition should be admissible at a criminal trial whenever it is relevant to prove that a defendant did or did not have the state of mind required for the *767 offense charged.”
— Minn. Stat. § 4.02(5) — 1 case
Oberhelman v. Schultze, 371 F. Supp. 1089 (D. Minnesota 1974). “” City Code of Fairmont § 4.02(5). The Court finds that defendants did not abuse the broad discretion granted them as officials of the city in the denial of plaintiff’s application.”
— Minn. Stat. § 4.02(i) — 1 case
Mesaba Aviation, Inc. v. Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Ass'n (In Re Mesaba Aviation, Inc.), 350 B.R. 112 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2006). “The lending agreement for that financing provides, at § 4.02(i), (i) Labor. The Borrower shall have either (i) obtained Tentative Agreements with each of its labor unions, in each case on terms reasonably satisfactory to the Agent or (ii) imposed new terms with the labor union…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.