Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 4.13 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Renumbered 116J.44]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1964–2011 · leading case: Sierra Club v. Clinton, 689 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. Minnesota 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Sierra Club v. Clinton, 689 F. Supp. 2d 1123 (D. Minnesota 2010). · cites it 2× “) Section 4.13 of the FEIS addresses the reliability and safety of the AC Pipeline and provides information on safety standards, spill history, potential spills, spill impacts, and mitigation of spills.”

Regents of the Univ. v. Applied Innovations, Inc., 685 F. Supp. 698 (D. Minnesota 1987). “18, § 4.13[A]. 21. The distribution of the MMPI test to those individuals administering the test for purposes of building the MMPI scales was a limited distribution.”

Davidov v. Honeywell, Inc., 515 F. Supp. 1358 (D. Minnesota 1981). “1962); Nahmod, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties § 4.13, at 128 (1979); Johnson v. Dailey, supra, 479 F.”

Woodson v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers Local 292, 974 F. Supp. 1256 (D. Minnesota 1997). “See Agreement § 4.13 (stating that applicant who is hired and received, through no fault of his own, work of forty hours or less, shall, upon registration, be restored to his placement).”

UnitedHealth Grp. Inc. v. Columbia Cas. Co., 836 F. Supp. 2d 912 (D. Minnesota 2011). “” Policy § 4.13; see also Policy § 4.18. Finally, as the Special Master found, the' business-risk doctrine does not override unambiguous policy language.”

Nash-Finch Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 233 F. Supp. 910 (D. Minnesota 1964). · cites it 4× “34 and related rules of the Commission’s Rules of Practice,” stating, in part, “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Chief Hearing Examiner hereby appoint and designate a hearing examiner to preside at such hearing with all the powers and duties as provided by Section 4.13 of the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.