Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 4.15 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1981 c 356 s 247]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1959–2022 · leading case: Koppinger v. City of Fairmont, 248 N.W.2d 708 (Minn. 1976).
Koppinger v. City of Fairmont, 248 N.W.2d 708 (Minn. 1976). “Both the beer establishment and the bowling facility are licensed under Fairmont City Code, § 4.15 and §§ 4.30 to 4.33. Plaintiff brought the instant action seeking a declaratory judgment that a city ordinance adopted after a special election on June 25,1974, was…”
Prudencio v. Hanselmann, 178 F. Supp. 887 (D. Minnesota 1959). “§ 4.15 (3rd ed. 1951). The plaintiff urges that the defendant has waived his right to object to improper venue because the defendant’s written notice of motion did not mention venue but referred only to the Court’s lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and the person of…”
Mgmt. Registry, Inc. v. A.W. Companies, Inc. (D. Minnesota 2022). “) Section 4.15 of the SPA stated, “[n]o broker, finder or investment banker is entitled to any brokerage finder’s or other fee or commission in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or any other Transaction Document based upon arrangements made by or on…”
Jeffrey A. August, Relator v. Chisago Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 868 N.W.2d 741 (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “The planning commission discussed the CUP and voted to recommended denial because it would violate “Section 4.15, part D, part five [of the rural retail tourism criteria], ‘creates negative impact on the neighborhood by intrusive noise.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.