Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 412. STATUTORY CITIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 412.041 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1957 [Repealed, 1959 c 686 s 14; Ex1959 c 75 s 1]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1951–1969 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Vill. of Mound, 48 N.W.2d 855 (Minn. 1951).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Vill. of Mound, 48 N.W.2d 855 (Minn. 1951). · cites it 8× “for annexation? (4) Where the territory to be annexed and the annexing village do not abut upon each other in any other manner than that they are located at opposite ends of an actually used and occupied railroad right of way — which is 100 feet wide and about five-eighths of a…”
State Ex Rel. Harrier v. Vill. of Spring Lake Park, 71 N.W.2d 812 (Minn. 1955). · cites it 5× “On January 16, 1954, the council of the village of Spring Lake Park acted upon a petition for the annexation of a certain portion of the township of Blaine to the village of Spring Lake Park, this being the disputed area, proceeding under § 412.041. An election was ordered and…”
Vill. of Farmington v. Minnesota Mun. Comm'n, 170 N.W.2d 197 (Minn. 1969). · cites it 2× “Thus, after the elections, the land was ostensibly within two separate municipalities. This situation resulted from the existence of independent statutory procedures for incorporation and annexation which could be utilized simultaneously, with the ultimate decision in each being…”
State Ex Rel. Town of White Bear v. City of White Bear Lake, 95 N.W.2d 294 (Minn. 1959). · cites it 2× “119, § 7 — now § 412.041). The new provision applicable to villages, which corresponds to § 413.”
State Ex Rel. Vill. of Orono v. Vill. of Long Lake, 77 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. 1956). “Inasmuch as the petition is valid in form and as the date of filing was prior to the commencement date of the Orono proceedings, this land has been validly annexed to Long Lake through its Ordinance No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.