Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 414.03 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1967 [Repealed, 1969 c 1146 s 20]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1962–1973 · leading case: Vill. of Farmington v. Minnesota Mun. Comm'n, 170 N.W.2d 197 (Minn. 1969).
Vill. of Farmington v. Minnesota Mun. Comm'n, 170 N.W.2d 197 (Minn. 1969). “While the commission is given discretionary power to approve or reject annexation petitions, § 414.03, subd. 4, provides that after a hearing, when required under c.”
City of Glencoe v. Beneke, 179 N.W.2d 279 (Minn. 1970). “1967, § 414.03, subd. 2, which provided a means by which a municipality may annex land which is 75 percent or more bordered on three sides by the municipality merely by serving notice of intent upon the township, and if no objections to the annexation are received from the…”
Minnesota Mun. Comm'n v. Town of White Bear, 129 N.W.2d 560 (Minn. 1964). “Judgment, consolidating the commission orders, was entered on January 16, 1964, whereby the court remanded the matter to the commission with instructions to hold an election on the question of annexation in the areas proposed for annexation pursuant to § 414.03, subd. 5, as…”
Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 700 v. City of Duluth, 170 N.W.2d 116 (Minn. 1969). “The use of the language “any municipality” in § 414.03, subd. 2, is so broad and all inclusive as to include municipalities operating under home rule charters.”
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington, 128 N.W.2d 97 (Minn. 1964). “1961, § 414.03, subd. 2, which, as far as material here, reads: *87 municipality.”
Appeal of Meyer v. Vill. of Waite Park, 152 N.W.2d 778 (Minn. 1967). “Appellants maintain that the counterpetition effectively reduced *25 the signatures on the original petition to less than a majority, and, thus, the commission should have ordered an election pursuant to § 414.03, subd. 5. However, based on the time and manner in which the…”
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington, 115 N.W.2d 923 (Minn. 1962). “39, pursuant to § 414.03, approving the petition of Northern States Power Company for annexation of the described lands and further declaring that said lands be annexed to defendant city, was so unreasonable, arbitrary, and oppressive as to be of no effect; that the description…”
City of Chaska v. Chaska Twp., 135 N.W.2d 195 (Minn. 1965). “1961, § 414.03, to annex 4,859 acres of unincorporated land in Chanhassen and Chaska townships; that after hearings thereon the Minnesota Municipal Commission entered its order, wherein approximately 3,508 acres of the land described in the petition were ordered annexed to the…”
Town of White Bear v. City of White Bear Lake, 168 N.W.2d 263 (Minn. 1969). “The issue for decision on appeal is whether an election and favorable vote of area resident voters in a township is required before annexation becomes effective where, pursuant to § 414.03, subd. 2, the city serves notice of intent to annex by ordinance adjoining township land,…”
Vill. of Lakeville v. Vill. of Farmington, 211 N.W.2d 897 (Minn. 1973). “1967, § 414.03, subd. 4, the commission “shall approve [annexation] if it finds that the property to be annexed is now, or is about to become, urban or suburban in character,” (italics supplied) while under the successor provision, Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.