Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 471.992 (2026)

Equitable Compensation Relationships

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Establishment.

Subject to sections 179A.01 to 179A.25 and sections 177.41 to 177.44 but notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, every political subdivision of this state shall establish equitable compensation relationships between female-dominated, male-dominated, and balanced classes of employees in order to eliminate sex-based wage disparities in public employment in this state. A primary consideration in negotiating, establishing, recommending, and approving compensation is comparable work value in relationship to other employee positions within the political subdivision. This law may not be construed to limit the ability of the parties to collectively bargain in good faith.

Subd. 2.Arbitration.

In all interest arbitration involving a class other than a balanced class held under sections 179A.01 to 179A.25, the arbitrator shall consider the equitable compensation relationship standards established in this section and the standards established under section 471.993, together with other standards appropriate to interest arbitration. The arbitrator shall consider both the results of a job evaluation study and any employee objections to the study. In interest arbitration for a balanced class, the arbitrator may consider the standards established under this section and the results of, and any employee objections to, a job evaluation study, but shall also consider similar or like classifications in other political subdivisions.

Subd. 3.

MS 1988 [Repealed, 1990 c 512 s 13]

Subd. 4.Collective bargaining.

In collective bargaining for a balanced class, the parties may consider the equitable compensation relationship standards established by this section and the results of a job evaluation study, but shall also consider similar or like classifications in other political subdivisions.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–1999 · leading case: Armstrong v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of St. Paul, 498 N.W.2d 471 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993).
Armstrong v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of St. Paul, 498 N.W.2d 471 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 18× “Appellant first claims relief under Minn.Stat. § 471.992, subd. 1 (1988). This section calls for the establishment of equitable compensation relationships between female-dominated, male-dominated, and balanced classes of employees.”
Op. Atty. Gen. 1035 (Cr. Ref. 170c) (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1999). · cites it 2× “26 and 27 and also Minn. Stat. §§ 471.992 to ‘ see Minn. stat § 645.”
Op. Atty. Gen. 1035 (Cr. Ref. 170c) (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1999). · cites it 2× “26 and 27 and also Minn. Stat. §§ 471.992 to 1 See Minn. Stat.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.