Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 473.651 (2026)

Rentals Fixed

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The corporation shall have the authority to determine the charges for the use of any of the property under its management and control, and the terms and conditions under which such property may be used. Where there is reasonable basis for classification of users as to any use, the corporation may classify users, but charges as to each class shall be reasonable and uniform for such use, and established with due regard to the value of the property and improvements used and the expense of operation to the corporation. The corporation shall have and may enforce liens as provided for in sections 514.18 to 514.22, to enforce the payment of any such charges.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1995–2003 · leading case: Nw. Airlines, Inc. v. Metro. Airports Comm'n, 672 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nw. Airlines, Inc. v. Metro. Airports Comm'n, 672 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 21× “Appellant contests the district court's dismissal of its declaratory judgment action, in which appellant sought a determination that Ordinance 87, enacted and enforced by respondent, violated Minn.Stat. § 473.651 (2002) and is beyond respondent's authority under Minn.”

Enter. Leasing Co. v. Metro. Airports Comm'n, 92 F. Supp. 2d 936 (D. Minnesota 2000). · cites it 24× “Validity of the Ordinance under Minn.Stat. § 473.651 Enterprise seeks a declaratory judgment stating that Ordinance 85 is invalid on the ground that MAC exceeded its statutory authority when it enacted the ordinance.”

Hyland v. Metro. Airports Comm'n, 538 N.W.2d 717 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 8× “Minn.Stat. § 473.651 (1994). We conclude that the above statutes authorize MAC to charge fees to operators of commercial vehicles using the commercial lanes at the airport to pick up passengers.”

Enter. Leasing Co., Doing Bus. as Enter. Rent-A-Car, a Minnesota Corp. v. Metro. Airports Comm'n, a Pub. Corp., 250 F.3d 1215 (8th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. Ann. § 473.651 (2001) (emphasis added).”

Branson v. Port of Seattle, 115 Wash. App. 695 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). “Where there is reasonable basis for classification of users as to any use, [MAC] may classify users, but charges as to each class shall be reasonable and uniform for such use, and established with due regard to the value of the property and improvements used and the expense of…”

Enter. Leasing Co. v. Metro. Airports Comm'n, 193 F.R.D. 641 (D. Minnesota 2000). · cites it 4× “Moreover, the Court’s interpretation is in accordance with the plain language of the statute. Thus, although a possibility of success on appeal exists as with any issue of first impression, MAC has not made a “strong showing” that such success is likely.”

Enter. Leasing v. Metro. Airport (8th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. Ann. § 473.651 (2001) (emphasis added).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.