Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 475.59 (2026)

Manner Of Submission; Notice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Generally; notice.

When the governing body of a municipality resolves to issue bonds for any purpose requiring the approval of the electors, it shall provide for submission of the proposition of their issuance at a general or special election or town or school district meeting. Notice of such election or meeting shall be given in the manner required by law and shall state the maximum amount and the purpose of the proposed issue. In any school district, the school board or board of education may, according to its judgment and discretion, submit as a single ballot question or as two or more separate questions in the notice of election and ballots the proposition of their issuance for any one or more of the following, stated conjunctively or in the alternative: acquisition or enlargement of sites, acquisition, betterment, erection, furnishing, equipping of one or more new schoolhouses, remodeling, repairing, improving, adding to, betterment, furnishing, equipping of one or more existing schoolhouses. In any city, town, or county, the governing body may, according to its judgment and discretion, submit as a single ballot question or as two or more separate questions in the notice of election and ballots the proposition of their issuance, stated conjunctively or in the alternative, for the acquisition, construction, or improvement of any facilities at one or more locations.

Subd. 2.Election date.

An election to approve issuance of bonds under this section held by a municipality or school district must be held on a date authorized in section 205.10, subdivision 3a, or 205A.05, subdivision 1a.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1965–2017 · leading case: Lindahl v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 306, 133 N.W.2d 23 (Minn. 1965).
Lindahl v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 306, 133 N.W.2d 23 (Minn. 1965). · cites it 8× “He argues that it was phrased in the alternative in two ways — (1) The statement of the purpose (for acquisition and betterment) and alternative, and (2) the amount of the issuance ($125,000 and not exceeding any debt limitations) was alternative.”
Douglas v. Stillwater Area Pub. Schs., 899 N.W.2d 546 (Minn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 475.59 . Here, the district court concluded that the law forbids the school district from unauthorized expenditures of proceeds of a bond obligation, but it does not permit the district court to order the school district to hold a referendum.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.