Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 487.30 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1993 c 321 s 7]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1985–2003 · leading case: Roehrdanz v. Brill, 668 N.W.2d 217 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
Roehrdanz v. Brill, 668 N.W.2d 217 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 8× “05 (providing that, when notice is served by mail, three days shall be added to the period allowed for service) with Minn. Stat § 487.30, subd. 9 (1990) (providing that procedures for removal from conciliation court must be performed within 20 days of *220 mailing of notice of…”
Lucas v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 403 N.W.2d 646 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 2× “lowing: (1) judgments, awards, or benefits in workers’ compensation cases, but not including third-party actions; (2) judgments, decrees, or orders in dissolution, annulment, or legal separation actions; *650 (3) judgments for future damages; (4) punitive damages, fines, or…”
Wilkins v. City of Glencoe, 479 N.W.2d 430 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 3× “9 (1990) provides: A person aggrieved by an order for judgment by a conciliation court judge after a contested hearing may remove the cause to * * * district court by performing the removal procedures specified by the rules of the supreme court within 20 days after the date the…”
Gary Builders Supply, Inc. v. Menard, Inc., 378 N.W.2d 98 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 487.30 limits the jurisdiction of the conciliation court to $1,250.”
In Re the Welfare of D.K., 363 N.W.2d 877 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “§ 487.30, subd. 1 (“rules * * * shall provide for a right of appeal from the decision of the conciliation court to the *880 county court for a trial on the merits”); see also Stuart, Judicial Powers of Non-Judges: The Legitimacy of Referee Functions in Minnesota Courts, 6 Wm.”
Ceminsky v. Mardell, 385 N.W.2d 888 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 487.30, subd. 1 (1984) (later raised to $2,000, see 1985 Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.