Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 501B.89 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2014 [Repealed, 2015 c 5 art 16 s 2]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2007 · leading case: Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of Rochester, 642 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Martin Ex Rel. Hoff v. City of Rochester, 642 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2002). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 501B.89, subd. 3 (2000). [19] The dissent implies that our decision impairs the right of a medical assistance recipient to transfer his/her causes of action by assignment.”

Hecker v. Stark Cnty. Soc. Serv. Bd., 527 N.W.2d 226 (N.D. 1995). · cites it 6× “In making distributions for the special needs defined herein, [the] Trustee shall take into consideration the applicable resource limitations of the public assistance programs for which the beneficiary is eligible." This language plainly indicates an intent not to provide…”

In Re Appeal of Decision of Comm'r of Human Servs., 725 N.W.2d 114 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 27× “And, because the trust provision restricting the trustee’s ability to make payments if appellant becomes eligible for public assistance is unenforceable as against public policy under Minn.Stat. § 501B.89 (2004), appellant can compel the trustee to provide for her support.”

Sullivan v. Schultz (In Re Schultz), 368 B.R. 832 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2007). · cites it 2× “§§ 1396p and 1382b(e)(5) and Minn.Stat. §§ 501B.89 and 524.5-412, in order to hold the inheritance and to allow Schultz to retain her eligibility for Medical Assistance.”

In Re Leona Carlisle Trust Created Under the Trust Agreement Dated February 9, 1985, 498 N.W.2d 260 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 501B.89 (1992) makes unenforceable a provision in a trust that purports to make "assets or income unavailable to a beneficiary if the beneficiary applies for or is determined eligible for public assistance or a public health care program.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.