Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 504.06 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1998 c 253 s 80]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1943–2013 · leading case: Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks, 580 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks, 580 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “1(2)-(3); see also Minn.Stat. § 504.06 (1996) (written notice to quit required to terminate estate at will).”

Koski v. Johnson, 837 N.W.2d 739 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “2d 289, 290 (1975) (discussing Minn.Stat. § 504.06 (1974), stating that “[o]ur decisions have consistently required strict statutory compliance”), cited in Annex Props.”

Schatz v. Davis, 354 N.W.2d 522 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 4× “ISSUE Whether written notice to quit and vacate under Minn.Stat. § 504.06 (1982) was a condition precedent to the trial court’s finding appellant guilty of unlawful detention? ANALYSIS 1.”

Mid-City Hotel Assocs. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. (In Re Mid-City Hotel Assocs.), 114 B.R. 634 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1990). “Unfortunately, there are no Minnesota state-court decisions which treat this hierarchy of relationships arising out of the occupancy of real estate in an explicatory fashion; more to the point, there is no extant Minnesota decision which classifies the nature of a hotel guest’s…”

Shortland v. Larson, 364 N.W.2d 67 (N.D. 1985). “[See Minn.Stat. § 504.06, which requires written notice of termination of a month-to-month tenancy; Markoe, 226 N.”

Tompkins v. Sandeen, 67 N.W.2d 405 (Minn. 1954). “To require a purchaser under an unenforceable contract to give notice of intention to quit to a defaulting vendor would be an unwarranted extension of § 504.06 resulting in obvious injustice. The only other assignment of error, which asserts that defendant should have been…”

State Bank of Loretto v. Dixon, 7 N.W.2d 351 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 504.06 (Mason St. 1927, § 8191); 2 Tiffany, Landlord and Tenant, pp.”

Anderson v. Ries, 24 N.W.2d 717 (Minn. 1946). · cites it 2× “1945, § 504.06, was served. Here, as below, defendant contends that plaintiffs were not entitled to maintain this action for unlawful detainer, upon the grounds: (1) They did not sustain to defendant the relation of landlord, and tenant; and (2) they did not serve upon defendant…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.