Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 504.18 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1998 c 253 s 80]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1975–1995 · leading case: Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Meyer v. Parkin, 350 N.W.2d 435 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 30× “Appellants Meyer contend the court erred in holding that Minn.Stat. § 504.18 (1982) did not remove the element of scienter from the rule that a lessor has a duty to warn a lessee of any concealed defects the lessor knew or should have known existed.”
Broughton v. Maes, 378 N.W.2d 134 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 12× “See Minn.Stat. § 504.18, subd. 3 (1984). [1] Having in mind the statutory covenants, the development of the law also requires consideration of a modern restatement of law on the subject: A lessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm caused to his lessee and others…”
Hanson v. Roe, 373 N.W.2d 366 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 14× “However, appellant alleges the stairway is in violation of Minn.Stat. § 504.18 (1982), which sets forth a lessor’s statutory covenants.”
Love v. Amsler, 441 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 5× “Substantial changes have occurred in landlord-tenant law since 1917, most significantly the 1971 enactment of Minn.Stat. § 504.18, which implies “covenants of habitability” in all residential leases.”
State, City of Minneapolis v. Ellis, 441 N.W.2d 134 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 12× “Does Minn.Stat. § 504.18, subd. 2 (1988) permit a lessor to transfer responsibility to the lessee for complying with the city health and safety laws? ANALYSIS 1.”
Oakland v. Stenlund, 420 N.W.2d 248 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 6× “Appellant argues that respondent therefore violated Minn.Stat. § 504.18, subd. 1(c) (1984). The trial court concluded that neither the statute nor the building code affected respondent’s common-law liability.”
Pugh v. Holmes, 405 A.2d 897 (Pa. 1979). “2d 850 (1972); Minnesota —Minn. Stat. § 504.18 (1974), applied in Fritz v.”
Heggestad v. Dubke, 229 N.W.2d 34 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 2× ““The statute to which I have reference is Section 504.18 of the Minnesota Statutes, and reads in applicable part: ‘In every lease of residential premises, whether in writing or parol, the lessor— the landlord — promises that the premises and all common areas are fit for the use…”
Bills v. Willow Run I Apts., 534 N.W.2d 286 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “(quoting Minn.Stat. § 504.18, subd. 1(a) (1982)). The court noted that the covenant of habitability only provides tenants with a defense to an unlawful detainer action for refusal to pay rent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.