Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 507. RECORDING AND FILING CONVEYANCES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 507.32 (2026)

Record, When Notice To Parties; Assignment Of Mortgage

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The record, as herein provided, of any instrument properly recorded shall be taken and deemed notice to parties. The record of an assignment of a mortgage shall not in itself be notice of such assignment to the mortgagor, the mortgagor's heirs or personal representatives, so as to invalidate any payment made by either of them to the mortgagee.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2021 · leading case: MidCountry Bank v. Krueger, 782 N.W.2d 238 (Minn. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
MidCountry Bank v. Krueger, 782 N.W.2d 238 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 9× “At issue in this appeal is whether a mortgage was “properly recorded” under Minn.Stat. § 507.32 (2008), thereby giving constructive notice to a subsequent purchaser of land and a mortgagee.”
Chaney v. Minneapolis Cmty. Dev. Agency, 641 N.W.2d 328 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× ““Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 507.32 [(2000)], a purchaser is charged as a matter of law with constructive notice of any properly recorded instrument.”
Manderfeld v. Krovitz, 539 N.W.2d 802 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 4× “We note, too, that although James Manderfeld may have been mistaken as to the validity of his option agreement, he could easily have been disabused of his mistaken belief had he simply checked to see who the record owners of this registered property were.”
Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban Nat'l Bank, 460 N.W.2d 63 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “Because that mortgage loan agreement contained a three-day cooling-off period, during which the Connellys could unilaterally cancel the agreement, Suburban did not disburse the proceeds until after Mrs.”
Streambend Props. III, LLC v. Sexton Lofts, LLC, 297 F.R.D. 349 (D. Minnesota 2014). · cites it 2× “See Minn.Stat. § 507.32 ("The record, as herein provided, of any instrument properly recorded shall be taken and deemed notice to parties.”
Ripley v. Piehl, 700 N.W.2d 540 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 507.32 (2004). “Constructive notice is a creature of statute and, as a matter of law, imputes notice to all purchasers of any properly recorded instrument even though the purchaser has no actual notice of the record.”
Palladium Holdings, LLC v. Zuni Mortg. Loan Trust 2006-OA1, 775 N.W.2d 168 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). “But the district court’s conclusion that Zuni was diligent is supported by Zuni’s assertions about when it received actual notice of the five-week redemption order, and we will not disturb the district court’s conclusion.”
Anderson v. Graham Inv. Co., 263 N.W.2d 382 (Minn. 1978). “By force of § 507.32, Anderson could not be a bona fide purchaser as to .”
Mavco, Inc. v. Eggink, 720 N.W.2d 841 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “See Minn.Stat. § 507.32 (2004) (stating that the "record .”
Howard, McRoberts & Murray v. Starry, 382 N.W.2d 293 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 507.32 (1984), a purchaser is charged as a matter of law with constructive notice of any properly recorded instrument.”
Ries v. Ibach (In Re Ibach), 399 B.R. 61 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2008). · cites it 2× “In Minnesota, constructive notice is a creature of statute, the Recording Act and Minn.Stat. § 507.32. 6 Anderson v. Graham Inv.”
Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Union Bank of California, N.A. (In Re Cornerstone E & P Co.), 436 B.R. 830 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2010). “” Minn.Stat. Ann. § 507.32 (“The record, as herein provided, of any instrument properly recorded shall be taken and deemed notice to parties.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.