Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 513.51 (2026)

Short Title

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 513.41 to 513.51, which was formerly cited as the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, may be cited as the "Uniform Voidable Transactions Act."

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2021 · leading case: George Reilly, as Tr. of the Nathan L. Bentson 1993 Irrevocable Trust v. Michael J. Antonello, 852 N.W.2d 694 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

George Reilly, as Tr. of the Nathan L. Bentson 1993 Irrevocable Trust v. Michael J. Antonello, 852 N.W.2d 694 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “51 (1996)); see Minn.Stat. § 513.51 (“Sections 513.41 to 513.”

Citizens State Bank Norwood Young Am. v. Brown, 829 N.W.2d 634 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). “§ 513.51 (“Sections 513.41 to 513.51 may be cited as the ‘Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act.”

Kelley v. Westford Special Situations Master Fund, L.P. (D. Minnesota 2020). · cites it 2× “4 After discovery closed, the Management Companies and 3 MUFTA was renamed the Minnesota Uniform Voidable Transactions Act in 2015, see Minn. Stat. § 513.51 , but the Parties agree that amendments made at that time are not material to their motions, and they use the acronym…”

Am. Fed. Bank v. West Cent. Ag Servs. (D. Minnesota 2021). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 513.51 . Here, West Central argues that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the Payment is not a “transfer.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.