Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518.5511 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1999 c 196 art 2 s 24]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1996–2006 · leading case: Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg, 578 N.W.2d 817 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg, 578 N.W.2d 817 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 80× “Each appeal is from a post-judgment child support order issued by an administrative law judge (ALJ) and raises constitutional challenges to the administrative child support process governed by Minn.Stat. § 518.5511 (1996). We address the separation of powers issue and conclude…”

Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg, 588 N.W.2d 720 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 22× “This appeal presents the issue of whether the administrative process, Minn.Stat. § 518.5511 (1996), violates the separation of powers doctrine by impinging upon the original jurisdiction of the district court, by creating a tribunal which is not inferior to the district court,…”

Kasdan v. Berney, 587 N.W.2d 319 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “On March 5, 1998, Kasdan requested an uncontested administrative modification of Berney’s child support obligations through Dakota County Community Services (Child Support Enforcement Unit) pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518.5511 (Supp.1997). Approximately 20 days later, Kasdan…”

Marriage of Murphy v. Murphy, 574 N.W.2d 77 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 518.5511, subd. 4(h) (1996); Lee v.”

Riley v. Jankowski, 713 N.W.2d 379 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “at 723 (quoting Minn.Stat. § 518.5511, subd. 1(e) (1996)) (citations omitted).”

Ver Kuilen v. Ver Kuilen, 578 N.W.2d 790 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “18, 1990); see Minn.Stat. § 518.5511, subd. 4(h) (1996) (providing same appeals process).”

Anderson v. Beaulieu, 555 N.W.2d 537 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “ISSUE Is the state court deprived of subject matter jurisdiction over this action when, after commencement of this action, Beaulieu retained employment on the reservation? ANALYSIS In contested administrative proceedings regarding child support orders, the decision and order of…”

Rouland v. Thorson, 542 N.W.2d 681 (Minn. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “18, 1990); see Minn.Stat. § 518.5511, subd. 4(h) (1994) (decision of ALJ “is appealable to the court of appeals in the same manner as a decision of the district court”).”

Cnty. of Washington v. Johnson, 568 N.W.2d 459 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 518.5511, subd. 2 (1996); see Minn.”

Loscheider v. Loscheider, 563 N.W.2d 331 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “10(c) was repealed and replaced by a similar provision in Minn.Stat. § 518.5511, subd. 4(c). 1994 Minn.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.