Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 518.611 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1997 c 203 art 6 s 93]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases, 1981–2010 · leading case: Rooney v. Rooney, 669 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003).
Rooney v. Rooney, 669 N.W.2d 362 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). “In 1990, the district court ruled that CHOF was Rooney's "employer" under Minn.Stat. § 518.611 (1990), and ordered CHOF to perform income withholding to pay Rooney's child support and spousal maintenance obligations.”
Marriage of Benedict v. Benedict, 361 N.W.2d 429 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Ristau then brought her original motion for support arrearages which also requested an increase in child support, an order granting wage withholding under Minn.Stat. § 518.611 (Supp.1983), and attorney’s fees.”
In Re the Welfare of M.J.M., 416 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “The income withholding provisions referred to are contained in Minn. Stat. § 518.611 (1986), and should have been included in the order.”
Marriage of Crace v. Crace, 396 N.W.2d 877 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “Chapters 352B (governing state trooper pensions), 353 and others were further amended in 1984 to limit the legal process exemption by allowing for the collection of child support or maintenance pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 518.611, which provides for the withholding of income to pay…”
Hadrava v. Hadrava, 357 N.W.2d 376 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “*380 III The last issue concerns denial of a wage withholding provision, Minn.Stat. § 518.611. This statute now requires such provisions in support orders, including orders previously issued, if requested by the obligee: When an order for withholding has not previously been…”
Finch v. Marusich, 457 N.W.2d 767 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “” Appellant claims the trial court lacked authority to order immediate wage withholding where the conditions set out in Minn.Stat. § 518.611, subd. 2 (1988) were not met.”
Marriage of Katz v. Katz, 408 N.W.2d 835 (Minn. 1987). “Laws 1062 -88 (now codified in part as Minn.Stat. § 518.611 (1984)); Act of May 26, 1977, ch.”
Marriage of Rooney v. Rooney, 478 N.W.2d 545 (Minn. Ct. App. 1991). “, challenges the trial court’s judgment against it as an ex-spouse’s employer for payment of maintenance and child support obligations as mandated income withholding under Minn.Stat. §§ 518.611 and 518.-613 (1990).”
Marriage of Moritz v. Moritz, 368 N.W.2d 337 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “Did the trial court correctly determine that Minn.Stat. § 518.611 takes precedence over id.”
In Re Storberg, 94 B.R. 144 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1988). “24 providing for security and sequestration as a mechanism for enforcing child support orders, and Minn.Stat. § 518.611 and Minn.Stat. § 518.”
Cnty. of Nicollet v. Haakenson, 497 N.W.2d 611 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “Finally, appellant asks this court to remove from the file three documents transmitted by the court administrator, to strike a statement in respondent’s brief, and to award appellant attorney fees and costs incurred in bringing the motion.”
Buckley v. Bd. of Trs. (In Re Swanson), 79 B.R. 422 (D. Minnesota 1987). “Any power of attorney, assignment or attempted assignment of a teacher’s interest in the fund, or of the beneficiary’s interest *425 therein, by a teacher or a beneficiary, shall be null and void and the same shall be exempt from taxation under chapter 291 and from garnishment…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.