Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 518C. UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518C.01 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1994 c 630 art 9 s 4]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1983–1993 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 361 N.W.2d 814 (Minn. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 361 N.W.2d 814 (Minn. 1985). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 518C.01 (1982). Our legislature has expressed the intent that custody and visitation should not bear on enforcement of' support obligations.”
England v. England, 337 N.W.2d 681 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “16 (1982), states, in part: “The determination or enforcement of a duty of support owed to one obligee is unaffected by interference by another obligee with rights of custody or visitation granted by a court.”
Douglas Cnty. Child Support Enf't Unit v. Cavegn, 420 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 518C.01 (1982). The duty of support is defined as a duty of support, whether imposed or imposable by law or order, decree or judgment of a court, whether interlocutory or final, or whether incidental to an action for divorce, separation, separate maintenance or…”
State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon, 337 N.W.2d 645 (Minn. 1983). “28 (1982) provides that “[djuties of support applicable under sections 518C.01 to 518C.36 are those imposed under the laws of the state where the obligor was present for the period during which support is sought.”
State of Wis. Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 349 N.W.2d 309 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Whether a sister state may collect child support arrearages in excess of the amount expended for child support? ANALYSIS Wisconsin proceeded against Chamber-land under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA) which states: “All duties of support, including the…”
State Ex Rel. Doucette v. Kraskey, 496 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “” Minn. Stat. § 518C.01 (1990). RURESA proceedings involve two jurisdictions; an initiating state or court in which the action is commenced and a responding state or court in which a responsive proceeding is commenced.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.