Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518C.20 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1994 c 630 art 9 s 4]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1985 · leading case: Faribault-Martin-Watonwan Human Servs. Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Jacobson, 363 N.W.2d 342 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Faribault-Martin-Watonwan Human Servs. Ex Rel. Jacobson v. Jacobson, 363 N.W.2d 342 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “Compare Minn.Stat. § 518C.20 (1982) (a RURESA support order does not nullify an existing order "unless specifically provided by the court.”

State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon, 337 N.W.2d 645 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 2× “Any support payments made by an obligor pursuant to a foreign URESA order must be “credited against amounts accruing or accrued for the same period under a support order” made by a court of this state, Minn.Stat. § 518C.20 (1982). Because all fifty states *649 have similar…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.