Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 518C.28 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1994 c 630 art 9 s 4]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1983–1993 · leading case: State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon, 337 N.W.2d 645 (Minn. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon, 337 N.W.2d 645 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 518C.28 (1982) provides that “[djuties of support applicable under sections 518C.”

State of Wis. Ex Rel. Southwell v. Chamberland, 349 N.W.2d 309 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “…unpaid." Minn.Stat. § 518C.02(3) (1982). 2 . Minnesota law applies here since Chamber-land resides in Minnesota. See Minn.Stat. § 518C.28 (1982).”

Douglas Cnty. Child Support Enf't Unit v. Cavegn, 420 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “" Minn.Stat. § 518C.28 (1982). The question is whether respondent has a duty of support under Minnesota law.”

State Ex Rel. Doucette v. Kraskey, 496 N.W.2d 425 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 8× “He cites Minn.Stat. § 518C.28 (1990), maintaining that if child support has not already been imposed or, as in this case, has been suspended or eliminated, RURESA cannot be invoked to impose a support obligation.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.