Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.19 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1974 [Repealed, 1975 c 347 s 144]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1953–1965 · leading case: Hursh v. Theis, 76 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. 1956).
Hursh v. Theis, 76 N.W.2d 677 (Minn. 1956). · cites it 4× “In our opinion in that case we decided only that § 525.19 did not apply to anyone other than the person named as executor in a will or codicil.”
Theis v. Theis, 135 N.W.2d 740 (Minn. 1965). · cites it 2× “” Section 525.19 requires that if the will is destroyed by one other than the testator at the testator’s direction, the destruction thereof shall be proved by at least two witnesses.”
Anthony v. Evangelical Lutheran Church, 121 N.W.2d 772 (Minn. 1963). “6 We adopt the rule announced in these decisions and hold that the wills signed by Alfred Anthony on April 21, 1958, and on March 27, 1959, may be effective to revoke previous wills if otherwise valid and executed in compliance with § 525.19, notwithstanding that as a matter of…”
In Re Est. of Anthony, 265 Minn. 382 (Minn. 1963). “[6] We adopt the rule announced in these decisions and hold that the wills signed by Alfred Anthony on April 21, 1958, and on March 27, 1959, may be effective to revoke previous wills if otherwise valid and executed in compliance with § 525.19, notwithstanding that as a matter…”
Stoppel v. Red River Valley Conf., 57 N.W.2d 22 (Minn. 1953). · cites it 2× “Section 525.19 further provides that: “* * * Nothing in this section shall prevent the revocation implied by law from subsequent change in the condition or circumstances of the testator.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.