Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 525. PROBATE PROCEEDINGS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 525.481 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1973 Supp [Repealed, 1974 c 442 art 8 s 524.8-102]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1943–1988 · leading case: Matter of Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc., 305 N.W.2d 755 (Minn. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Irrevocable Inter Vivos Trust, Etc., 305 N.W.2d 755 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “Since it was the sole legatee, State Bank argues, under Minn.Stat. § 525.481 (1973) it was authorized to waive the hearing and consent to the proposed accounting and distribution.”
Barrett v. MacDonald, 121 N.W.2d 165 (Minn. 1963). · cites it 2× “[5] § 525.481, paragraph 4; In re Estate of Lindmeyer, 182 Minn.”
In Re Est. of Hencke, 19 N.W.2d 718 (Minn. 1945). · cites it 2× “1941, § 525.481 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 8992-115), wherein it *418 determined that Ida, Fred’s sister, should take two-thirds of the property here involved and that four California charities should each take one-twelfth, one-third in all.”
State Bank & Trust Co. v. Melzark, 305 N.W.2d 755 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “Since it was the sole legatee, State Bank argues, under Minn.Stat. § 525.481 (1973) it was authorized to waive the hearing and consent to the proposed accounting and distribution.”
In Re the Trust Created Under the Last Will & Testament of Cargill, 420 N.W.2d 268 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “The concept of common law offset or right of retainer was codified in Minn.Stat. § 525.481, repealed by Laws 1974, ch.”
In Re Est. of Staples, 8 N.W.2d 45 (Minn. 1943). “1941, § 525.481 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 8992-115), also relied on by appellants, likewise extends only to a situation where the debt, although barred by the statute of limitations, *343 has not been paid or cancelled; hence it is inapplicable to the case at hand.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.