Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 546.14 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1971 [Repealed, 1974 c 394 s 11]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1971–1978 · leading case: Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Bd. of Twp. Trs., 582 P.2d 271 (Kan. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Bd. of Twp. Trs., 582 P.2d 271 (Kan. 1978). “( Minn. Stat. § 546.14 [1971].) Texas, by statute, did not go quite as far as Minnesota, but it nonetheless allows the jury to be indirectly informed as to the legal effects of its answers.”

Patterson v. Donahue, 190 N.W.2d 864 (Minn. 1971). “1969, § 546.14, although by statutory authority this provision was superseded as of January 1, *288 1952, by promulgation by this court of Rule 51, Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Kindt v. Yellow Cab of Winona, Inc., 218 N.W.2d 459 (Minn. 1974). · cites it 2× “1971, § 546.14], to allow counsel to argue, if they request it.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.