Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 546.24 (2026)

Receiving Verdict

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the verdict is given, and is such as the court may receive, the court administrator shall immediately file said verdict in open court, and read it to the jury, and inquire of them whether it is their verdict. If any juror disagrees, the fact shall be entered in the minutes, and the jury again sent out; but if no disagreement is expressed, the verdict is complete, and the jury shall be discharged from the case. The court administrator shall forthwith record such verdict in full in the court minutes.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1952–2019 · leading case: Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., 206 P.3d 403 (Cal. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Keener v. Jeld-Wen, Inc., 206 P.3d 403 (Cal. 2009). “”]; Minn. Stat. § 546.24 [“If any juror disagrees, the fact shall be entered in the minutes, and the jury again sent out"]; Mont.”

Weatherhead v. Burau, 55 N.W.2d 703 (Minn. 1952). · cites it 5× “) Section 546.24 provides: “When the verdict is given, and is such as the court may receive, the clerk shall immediately file said verdict in open court, and read it to the jury, and inquire of them whether it is their verdict.”

Sabraski v. N. States Power Co., 304 N.W.2d 635 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “On appeal defendants urge that the trial court was required to accept the answers first given by the jury because that verdict was “complete” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 546.24 (1980), the clerk was required by that statute “forthwith” to record the verdict, and the…”

State v. LeRoy, 594 N.W.2d 193 (Minn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “[1] Minn.Stat. § 546.24 (1998), which applies to civil trials, states: When the verdict is given, and is such as the court may receive, the court administrator shall immediately file said verdict in open court, and read it to the jury, and inquire of them whether it is their…”

Anderson v. Indep. Sch. Dist. 696, 924 N.W.2d 911 (Minn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 17× “Minn. Stat. § 546.24 (2018). ISD 696 emphasizes the phrase, "but if no disagreement is expressed, the verdict is complete, and the jury shall be discharged from the case," in urging us to hold erroneous the district court's allowing the jury to deliberate to amend its…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.