Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 554.18 (2026)

Uniformity Of Application And Construction

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In applying and construing this uniform act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2025–2026 · leading case: J&D Dental, et al., Respondents, vs. Liya Hou, Appellant (Minn. Ct. App. 2025).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

J&D Dental, et al., Respondents, vs. Liya Hou, Appellant (Minn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “” (quotation omitted)); Minn. Stat. § 554.18 (“In applying and construing [UPEPA], consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”

Paragon Restorations, LLC, a Minnesota Ltd. Liab. Co. v. Robinet Prods., LLC, a Minnesota ... (Minn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “”); see also Minn. Stat. § 554.18 (2024) (“In applying and construing [UPEPA], consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”

Ashley Anderson v. Adam Aaron Anderson (Minn. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “3d at 150; see also Minn. Stat. § 554.18 (“In applying and construing [UPEPA], consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.