Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 555.05 (2026)

Enumeration Not Exclusive

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The enumeration in sections 555.02 to 555.04 does not limit or restrict the exercise of the general powers conferred in section 555.01, in any proceeding where declaratory relief is sought, in which judgment or decree will terminate the controversy or remove an uncertainty.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1949–2003 · leading case: Honn v. City of Coon Rapids, 313 N.W.2d 409 (Minn. 1981).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Honn v. City of Coon Rapids, 313 N.W.2d 409 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “01, in any proceeding where declaratory relief is sought, in which judgment or decree will terminate the controversy or remove an uncertainty.”

All. for Metro. Stability v. Metro. Council, 671 N.W.2d 905 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 555.05 (2002). A declaratory judgment may be entered regardless of whether “further relief is or could be claimed,” and it will lie when “legal relations are affected by a statute, municipal ordinance, contract, or franchise.”

Bengtson v. Setterberg, 35 N.W.2d 623 (Minn. 1949). “See, § 555.05. Borchard, Declaratory Judgments (2 ed.”

Harrington v. Fairchild, 51 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. 1952). “04 enumerate the powers of the court under the act; but § 555.05 states that such enumerated powers do “not limit or restrict the exercise of the general powers conferred in section 555.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.