Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 558.215 (2026)

Orders, Interlocutory Judgments; Appeals

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any party to any partition proceedings may appeal from any order or interlocutory judgment made and entered pursuant to section 558.04, 558.07, 558.14, or 558.21, to the court of appeals within 30 days after the making and filing of the order or interlocutory judgment. Any appeal shall be taken as in other civil cases.

All matters determined by any order or interlocutory judgment shall be conclusive and binding upon all parties to the proceedings and shall never be subject to review by the court unless appealed from as provided herein.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1952–2025 · leading case: Glenwood Inv. Props., L.L.C. v. Carroll A. Britton Fam. Trust, 765 N.W.2d 112 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Glenwood Inv. Props., L.L.C. v. Carroll A. Britton Fam. Trust, 765 N.W.2d 112 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 6× “30, 1998), which states that to be ap-pealable under Minn.Stat. § 558.215, a ruling must mandate either a partition or sale.”

Beebout v. Beebout, 447 N.W.2d 465 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “The appellants’ right to appeal partition-related orders and interlocutory judgments is governed by Minn.Stat. § 558.215 (1988), which states: Any party to any partition proceedings may appeal from any order or interlocutory judgment made and entered pursuant to section 558.”

Ullman v. Lutz, 55 N.W.2d 57 (Minn. 1952). · cites it 3× “08), which allows a six-month appeal period instead of the 30 days prescribed by § 558.215. Appellants’ counsel, who is a practitioner from another jurisdiction, did not learn of his error until after he had served and filed the notice of appeal — and bond — on August 26, 1952.”

Wendy Sills v. Kevin Thomes (Minn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 22× “04 (2024) is not immediately appealable under Minn. Stat. § 558.215 (2024). SPECIAL TERM OPINION FRISCH, Chief Judge In this interlocutory appeal, appellant Kevin Thomes seeks review of a February 2025 district court order denying his motion to appoint a panel of referees to…”

Lowe v. Patterson, 135 N.W.2d 38 (Minn. 1965). “20 provides: “The referees shall report the sale to thé court, describing the different parcels sold to each purchaser, and specifying the name of the purchaser, * * § 558.215 provides: “Any party to any partition proceedings may appeal from any order or interlocutory judgment…”

Neumann v. Anderson, 916 N.W.2d 41 (2018). “" Minn. Stat. § 558.215 (2016). The Neumanns concede that the Pronschinskes' notice of appeal was properly filed because the district court's August 17, 2017 order was filed pursuant to section 558.”

Marian v. Swanson v. Terrence K. Swanson (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “Appellant timely filed an appeal under Minn. Stat. § 558.215 (2012). ISSUES I. Did appellant waive the right to challenge the district court’s characterization of respondent’s property interests? II.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.