As a proceeding ancillary to a civil action for the recovery of money and to any action brought by the attorney general under the authority of section 8.31, subdivision 1, or any other law respecting unfair, discriminatory, or other unlawful practices in business, commerce, or trade, the claimant, at the time of commencement of the civil action or at any time afterward, may have the property of the respondent attached in the manner and in the circumstances prescribed in sections 570.01 to 570.14, as security for the satisfaction of any judgment that the claimant may recover. The order for attachment may be issued only by a judge of the court in the county in which the civil action is pending. All property not exempt from execution under the judgment demanded in the civil action is subject to attachment.
Notes of Decisions
Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City of Hopkins, 379 F. Supp. 2d 1030 (D. Minnesota 2005).
· cites it 5× “at § 570.01, subd. 4. A "sign" is also defined as any billboard, showbill, showboard, or sign containing advertising or directional matter: the term does not include traffic directional signs erected and maintained pursuant to law.”
Allstate Sales & Leasing Co. v. Geis, 412 N.W.2d 30 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 570.01. The statute provides five exclusive grounds for attachment, two of which cover the situation Allstate claims exists here: An order for attachment which is intended to provide security for the satisfaction of a judgment may be issued only in the following…”
Fifth Side Lodging, LLC v. Rise Constr. Servs., LLC (D. Minnesota 2024).
· cites it 7× “LEGAL STANDARD Fifth Side seeks the remedy of prejudgment attachment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64 and Minn. Stat. § 570.01 . (Dkt. 21.) Rule 64(a) provides: “At the commencement of and throughout an action, every remedy is available that, under the law of the state…”
Robert Davis Constr., Inc. v. Morgan C. Althoen (Minn. Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 4× “Appellants maintain that the district court’s order was effectively an order for attachment under Minn. Stat § 570.01 (2012) and that the court failed to make any findings as to the requisite grounds for attachment under Minn.”
Lenahan v. Landsberger, 392 N.W.2d 548 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 570.01 (1982) (emphasis added).”
Colman v. Mertes, 408 N.W.2d 662 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987).
· cites it 2× “” Minn.Stat. § 570.01 (1986). Under ordinary circumstances, a claimant must proceed by motion, and an order of attachment may issue only after notice and a hearing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.