Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 570.011 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Scope.

For the purposes of sections 570.01 to 570.14, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them.

Subd. 2.Claimant.

"Claimant" means a party requesting an order of attachment, whether that party is the plaintiff, defendant, or any other party in the civil action.

Subd. 3.Respondent.

"Respondent" means a party against whom an order of attachment is requested.

Subd. 4.Designation of parties.

Each pleading or other document presented for filing pertaining to the ancillary proceeding for attachment shall designate each party as claimant or respondent.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1998–2023 · leading case: Morrison v. Doyle, 570 N.W.2d 692 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Morrison v. Doyle, 570 N.W.2d 692 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “” Minn.Stat. § 570.011, subd. 3 (1996). The district court correctly held that all appellants are “respondents” under this statute because the Morrisons sought an order for attachment against all of them.”

Carolina Holdings Midwest, LLC, a Delaware Ltd. Liab. Co., d/b/a Inter-State Lumber v. James A.... (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 20× “Minn. Stat. § 570.011 (2000), providing the definitions relevant to the statutes on attachment, does not define creditor.”

Carolina Holdings Midwest, LLC v. Copouls, 658 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Minn. Stat. § 570.011 (2000), providing the definitions relevant to the statutes on attachment, does not define creditor.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.