Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 571.41 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1988 [Repealed, 1990 c 606 art 3 s 39]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases, 1952–1993 · leading case: Savchuk v. Rush, 245 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1976).
Savchuk v. Rush, 245 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1976). “04(2), Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides in part, "When quasi in rem jurisdiction [is] obtained, a party defending such action thereby submits personally to the jurisdiction of the court," applies in cases where jurisdiction is obtained pursuant to § 571.41, subd. 2, only…”
Savchuk v. Randal Rush, 245 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1976). “04(2), Rules of Civil Procedure, which provides in part, “When quasi in rem jurisdiction [is] obtained, a painty defending such action thereby submits personally to the jurisdiction of the court,” applies in cases where jurisdiction is obtained pursuant to § 571.41, subd. 2,…”
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286 (1980). “[3] The plaintiff asserted jurisdiction pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 571.41 , subd. 2 (1978), which allows garnishment of an insurer's obligation to defend and indemnify its insured.”
Rintala v. Shoemaker, 362 F. Supp. 1044 (D. Minnesota 1973). “This underpinning for these decisions ceased to prevent garnishment of insurance policies when Minnesota modified Minn.Stat. § 571.41 by adding Subd. 2 in 1969.”
Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361 (Minn. 1982). “Kempton, an Iowa resident, by garnishing Kempton’s auto insurance policy with Travelers Insurance Company under Minn.Stat. § 571.41, subd. 2 (1978). Hoff served Travelers with a pre-garnishment summons on March 8, 1979, through service on the Minnesota Commissioner of Insurance.”
West Am. Ins. Co. v. Westin, Inc., 337 N.W.2d 676 (Minn. 1983). “Additional support for the proposition that Minnesota's interest is irrelevant in the jurisdictional calculus is found in the facts of Rush itself.”
Jones Press, Inc. v. Motor Travel Servs., Inc., 176 N.W.2d 87 (Minn. 1970). “571, more particularly, §§ 571.41, 571.42, and 571.60. 1 Plaintiff seeks to recover $100,000 in damages, alleging a *206 wrongful conversion of lithographic negatives by defendant.”
Nw. Airlines, Inc. v. Roemer, 603 F. Supp. 7 (D. Minnesota 1984). “The notice to the taxpayer shall be in substantially the same form as that provided in section 571.41. The notice shall further inform the taxpayer of the wage exemptions contained in section 550.”
Gustafson v. Johnson, 51 N.W.2d 108 (Minn. 1952). “Respondent further contends that the action against it will not support a garnishment because it is not an action for the recovery of money within the meaning of § 571.41. It is conceded that in the original motion to bring in third-party defendants and in the court’s order…”
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., 428 N.W.2d 419 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Minn. Stat. §§ 571.41 , .42, .471, subd. 2, .”
Moratzka v. Bill Simek Distrib., Inc. (In Re Brinker), 12 B.R. 936 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1981). “§ 571.41 et seq. 4. § 547(e)(2) determines when a transfer is made: “[A] transfer is made — (A) at the time such transfer takes effect between the transferor and the transferee, if such transfer is perfected at, or within 10 days after, such time; (B) at the time such transfer…”
Anchor Gas, Inc. v. Border Black Top, Inc., 381 N.W.2d 96 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “, for proceedings supplementary to and in aid of execution and in Minn.Stat.Ann. § 571.41 for garnishment to enforce a judgment.”
— Minn. Stat. § 571.41(2) — 1 case
Jeans v. Mitchell, 418 F. Supp. 730 (D. Minnesota 1976).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.