Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 571.42 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1988 [Repealed, 1990 c 606 art 3 s 39]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1951–1993 · leading case: Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., 448 N.W.2d 865 (Minn. 1989).
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., 448 N.W.2d 865 (Minn. 1989). “The judgment creditors initiated the garnishment proceedings by serving a garnishment summons and disclosure form pursuant to Minn.”
Moratzka v. Bill Simek Distrib., Inc. (In Re Brinker), 12 B.R. 936 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1981). “§ 571.42 subd. 1 provides: “Except as provided in sections 571.”
Marriage of Last v. Last, 438 N.W.2d 122 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “Over appellant’s objection, the trial court ruled that appellant’s maintenance payments are subject to garnishment to satisfy the pre-existing judgment.”
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co., 428 N.W.2d 419 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). “Minn.Stat. § 571.42, subd. 1 (1986) states: Service of the garnishee summons upon garnishee shall attach and bind, to respond to final judgment in the [underlying] action 5 .”
Widgren v. Massie, 352 N.W.2d 420 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Minn. Stat. § 571.42 , snbd. 1 (Supp.1983) provides that: Except as provided in sections 571.”
Johnson v. Dutch Mill Dairy, Inc., 54 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1952). “It is clear from the language of § 571.42 that the garnishment process is intended to impound only assets in the hands of the garnishee at the time the garnishee summons is served.”
In Re Klingbeil, 119 B.R. 178 (Bankr. D. Minn. 1990). “[Sjervice of the garnishee summons upon the garnishee shall attach and bind, to respond to final judgment in the action, all personal property of the judgment debtor in the possession of, or under the control of the garnishee and all indebtedness owing by the garnishee to the…”
Jones Press, Inc. v. Motor Travel Servs., Inc., 176 N.W.2d 87 (Minn. 1970). “” § 571.42. “Subdivision 1. Except as provided in sections 571.”
Raidt v. United States, 130 N.W.2d 121 (Minn. 1964). “situation by the inclusion in Section 571.42 M. S. A. (the garnishment statute) of the right to garnish all moneys or profits of an heir or devisee in the hands of a representative.”
B & B Floor Covering Co. v. Country View Builders, Inc., 504 N.W.2d 272 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). “Contrary to appellant's argument, the language of this new statute is virtually the same as its predecessor, Minn.Stat. § 571.42, subd. 2 (1988): [A]ll money, all nonexempt disposable earnings earned or to be earned within that pay period and within 60 days thereafter and other…”
In re Trailer Transit, Inc., 96 F. Supp. 571 (D. Minnesota 1951). “Minn. Stat.Ann. § 571.42. Pietrus sought to catch all the funds which the agent might have for Trailer Transit, not merely the funds in question.”
Cent. Collection Serv., Inc. v. Reynolds, 438 N.W.2d 396 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “Minn. Stat. § 571.42 (1988). For the purposes of a garnishment proceeding, nonexempt “ ‘earnings’ means compensation paid or payable * * * to the producer for the sale of * * * milk or milk products.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.