Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 571.49 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1974 [Repealed, 1976 c 335 s 24]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1950–1976 · leading case: Henderson v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 43 N.W.2d 786 (Minn. 1950).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Henderson v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 43 N.W.2d 786 (Minn. 1950). · cites it 3× “Section 571.49, subd. 2(3), provides that the garnishee shall disclose if he.”

Rintala v. Shoemaker, 362 F. Supp. 1044 (D. Minnesota 1973). · cites it 2× “Aetna in response to interrogatories served under Minn.Stat. § 571.49 requested information concerning its contractual relationship with defendant.”

Savchuk v. Rush, 245 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1976). “In response to the garnishment summons, State Farm disclosed pursuant to § 571.49 that nothing was due and owing Rush as judgment debtor.”

Nw. Nat. Bank, Etc. v. Hilton & Assocs., 136 N.W.2d 646 (Minn. 1965). · cites it 3× “” This argument fails to recognize that § 571.49 is procedural in aspect and contemplates that the garnishee disclose the full nature of his relationship to defendant.”

Savchuk v. Randal Rush, 245 N.W.2d 624 (Minn. 1976). “In response to the garnishment summons, State Farm disclosed pursuant to § 571.49 that nothing was due and owing Rush as judgment debtor.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.