Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 571.50 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1988 [Repealed, 1990 c 606 art 3 s 39]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1950–1989 · leading case: Wise v. Midtown Motors, Inc., 42 N.W.2d 404 (Minn. 1950).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wise v. Midtown Motors, Inc., 42 N.W.2d 404 (Minn. 1950). “61 or by discharge thereof under § 571.50 “as to any property or indebtedness in excess of the amount which may be required to satisfy plaintiff’s judgment.”

Henderson v. Nw. Airlines, Inc., 43 N.W.2d 786 (Minn. 1950). “A garnishee’s disclosure is conclusive against the plaintiff (§ 571.50) unless the latter successfully controverts the disclosure in the manner specified by statute (§ 571.”

Nichols v. Meilahn, 444 N.W.2d 872 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 571.50 (1988). Pacific’s initial garnishment disclosure disclaiming liability to the judgment debtors was served on appellant’s counsel and filed with the trial court in late May 1988.”

Nw. Nat'l Bank v. Delta Studios, Inc., 184 N.W.2d 3 (Minn. 1971). · cites it 2× “Accordingly, the basic issue posed by the parties on appeal is whether plaintiff’s failure to file a supplemental complaint pursuant to § 571.50 rendered garnishee’s disclosure conclusive against plaintiff.”

S & N Elevator Co. v. Mannillo, 415 N.W.2d 450 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “Minn.Stat. § 571.50 (1986). However, if the judgment creditor files an objection to the disclosure within those 20 days, the discharge is stayed.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.