Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 572.02 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 633 s 24]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1987–2016 · leading case: Steven Duane Auers, personally, & as Tr. for the next of kin of Karen Auers v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co., 878 N.W.2d 350 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016).
Steven Duane Auers, personally, & as Tr. for the next of kin of Karen Auers v. Progressive Direct Ins. Co., 878 N.W.2d 350 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). “251 here leaves the heirs and next of kin un-dercompensated for the damages properly recoverable under section 572.02, subdivision 2. DECISION Where a health-insurance carrier negotiates a discount from the medical providers of an injured plaintiff and obtains a subrogation hen…”
Tank v. Chronister, 951 F. Supp. 182 (D. Kan. 1997). “Minn.Stat. § 572.02. The court started with the uneontroverted premise that the general purpose of the 1988 amendment to § 1332 was to limit diversity jurisdiction.”
Brady v. Wardin, 412 N.W.2d 763 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “The motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit setting forth in detail: (1) the basis and amount of the claim in the civil action; and (2) the facts which constitute one or more grounds for attachment specified in section 572.02. ⅝ ⅜ ⅝ * ⅜ ⅜ Subd. 3. Standards for order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.