Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 572. ARBITRATION; MEDIATION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 572.20 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 2010 [Repealed, 2010 c 264 art 1 s 32]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases, 1975–2005 · leading case: All Metro Supply, Inc. v. Warner, 707 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
All Metro Supply, Inc. v. Warner, 707 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 14× “Minn.Stat. § 572.20, subd. 1 (2004), provides that upon application made within 90 days, the district court shall modify or correct the award where: (1) There was an evident miscalculation of figures or an evident mistake in the description of any person, thing or property…”
Hilltop Constr., Inc. v. Lou Park Apts., 324 N.W.2d 236 (Minn. 1982). · cites it 4× “” Lou Park then applied to the American Arbitration Association for a modification of the award as provided in Minn.Stat. § 572.20 (1980), but the request was denied.”
Crosby-Ironton Fed'n of Teachers, Local 1325 v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 182, 285 N.W.2d 667 (Minn. 1979). · cites it 6× “Therefore, the trial court clearly could not have ordered the arbitrator to modify the award under Minn.Stat. §§ 572.20, subd. 1(3) and 572.”
Motion Control Corp. v. Sick, Inc., 354 F.3d 702 (8th Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “Displeased with the result reached by the arbitrator, on June 28, 2002, MCC filed suit in Minnesota state court, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 572.20, seeking an order to either modify or vacate the second arbitration award.”
City of Richfield v. Local No. 1215, Int'l Ass'n of Fire Fighters, 276 N.W.2d 42 (Minn. 1979). “19, and § 572.20.” Although the standards allow the arbitrators fairly wide latitude in their determinations, this does not suggest that such freedom is unconstitutional.”
Hedlund v. Citizens Sec. Mut. Ins. Co., 377 N.W.2d 460 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 4× “Citizens then moved the court for a modification or correction of the arbitration award pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 572.20 (1984) and for a denial of plaintiff’s interest, costs, and disbursements.”
Int'l Union of Elec. & Mach. Workers, Local No.1140 v. Portec, Inc., 228 N.W.2d 239 (Minn. 1975). · cites it 4× “Any doubt that the word “and” is used in a conjunctive sense may be dispelled by referring to the legislative history of § 572.20, subd. 1(2). Prior to 1957, the predecessor of clause (2) 4 provided as follows: “(2) Where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted…”
Menahga Educ. Ass'n v. Menahga Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 821, 568 N.W.2d 863 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “20, on submission to the arbitrators by the court under such conditions as the court may order, the arbitrators may modify or correct the award upon the grounds stated in section 572.20 subdivision 1, or for the purpose of clarifying the award.”
Koranda v. Austin Mut. Ins. Co., 397 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “The trial court concluded that grounds for modification of the award did not exist under Minn. Stat. § 572.20 (1984) and that Austin Mutual was not entitled to vacate the award under Minn.”
New Creative Enter., Inc. v. Dick Hume & Assocs., Inc., 494 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 572.20. This level of review is provided to parties that have consented to arbitrate their disputes, thereby voluntarily relinquishing their primary recourse to the courts.”
Local P-9, United Food & Com. Workers Int'l Union v. George A. Hormel & Co., 599 F. Supp. 319 (D. Minnesota 1984). · cites it 4× “Reconsideration under the Minnesota Arbitration Act The Minnesota Arbitration Act provides for three fairly limited situations in which an arbitrator may “modify or correct” an award: *324 Minn.Stat. § 572.20. These exceptions are not inconsistent with the main thrust of the…”
Pulju v. Metro. Prop. & Cas., 535 N.W.2d 608 (Minn. 1995). · cites it 2× “Its correction or modification of the award pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 572.20 (1994) resulted in the entry of judgment in accordance with Minn.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 572.20(1) — 1 case
Minnesota Licensed Practical Nurses Ass'n v. Bemidji Clinic, Ltd., 352 N.W.2d 65 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
— Minn. Stat. § 572.20(2) — 1 case
Local P-9, United Food & Com. Workers Int'l Union v. George A. Hormel & Co., 599 F. Supp. 319 (D. Minnesota 1984). “Reconsideration under the Minnesota Arbitration Act The Minnesota Arbitration Act provides for three fairly limited situations in which an arbitrator may “modify or correct” an award: *324 Minn.Stat. § 572.20. These exceptions are not inconsistent with the main thrust of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.