Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 572B.03 (2026)
When Act Applies
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Sections 572B.01 to 572B.31 govern agreements to arbitrate entered into:
(1) on or after August 1, 2011; and
(2) before August 1, 2011, if all parties to the agreement to arbitrate or to arbitration proceedings agree in a record to be governed by sections 572B.01 to 572B.31.
(b) On or after August 1, 2011, sections 572B.01 to 572B.31 govern agreements to arbitrate even if the arbitration agreement was entered into prior to August 1, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2023 · leading case: Elsenpeter v. St. Michael Mall, Inc., 794 N.W.2d 667 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011).
Elsenpeter v. St. Michael Mall, Inc., 794 N.W.2d 667 (Minn. Ct. App. 2011). “Minn.Stat. § 572B.03 (2010). The parties did not so agree in this case; therefore, we cite to the 1956 version of the Uniform Arbitration Act, as adopted in Minnesota.”
Savanna Grove Coach Homeowners' Ass'n v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. (D. Minnesota 2020). “01, is an “agreement to arbitrate” under Minn. Stat. § 572B.03 and therefore governed by the Minnesota Uniform Arbitration Act.”
Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Rymer Companies, LLC (D. Minnesota 2023). “Noting the differences between arbitration awards and appraisal awards, the court held that “the appraisal process under the Minnesota Standard Fire Insurance Policy is not an ‘agreement to arbitrate’ under section 572B.03 of the Minnesota Uniform Arbitration Act.”
Jovani Nassar v. U.S. Home Corp. d/b/a Lennar Homes (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “See Minn. Stat. § 572B.03(b) (2014). Its predecessor statute only allowed for the taxation of costs and disbursements and did not provide for an award of attorney fees by the district court.”
— Minn. Stat. § 572B.03(b) — 1 case
Jovani Nassar v. U.S. Home Corp. d/b/a Lennar Homes (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “See Minn. Stat. § 572B.03(b) (2014). Its predecessor statute only allowed for the taxation of costs and disbursements and did not provide for an award of attorney fees by the district court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.