(a) An agreement contained in a record to submit to arbitration any existing or subsequent controversy arising between the parties to the agreement is valid, enforceable, and irrevocable except upon a ground that exists at law or in equity for the revocation of contract.
(b) The court shall decide whether an agreement to arbitrate exists or a controversy is subject to an agreement to arbitrate, except in the case of a grievance arising under a collective bargaining agreement when an arbitrator shall decide.
(c) An arbitrator shall decide whether a condition precedent to arbitrability has been fulfilled and whether a contract containing a valid agreement to arbitrate is enforceable.
(d) If a party to a judicial proceeding challenges the existence of, or claims that a controversy is not subject to, an agreement to arbitrate, the arbitration proceeding may continue pending final resolution of the issue by the court, unless the court otherwise orders.
Notes of Decisions
City of Rochester v. Kottschade, 896 N.W.2d 541 (Minn. 2017).
· cites it 7× “*544 Following the hearing on the parties’ motions, the district court determined that the parties had an “enforceable agreement to arbitrate and that the disputes raised fall within the scope” of the agreement, see Minnesota Statutes § 572B.06(b) (2016). The court granted SJC’s…”
Coloplast A/S v. Caldera Med., Inc. (D. Minnesota 2021).
· cites it 2× “2005); Minn. Stat. § 572B.06(a) (“An agreement contained in a record to submit to arbitration any existing or subsequent controversy arising between the parties to the agreement is valid, enforceable and irrevocable except upon a ground that exists at law or in equity for the…”
Byars v. Dart Transit Co. (M.D. Tenn. 2019).
· cites it 2× “Minn Stat. § 572B.06. Notwithstanding this objective evidence of her assent to arbitration, Plaintiff contends that the arbitration agreements she signed are invalid and unenforceable because (1) the potential arbitrator pool and arbitration rules are biased in favor of…”
— Minn. Stat. § 572B.06(a) — 1 case
Coloplast A/S v. Caldera Med., Inc. (D. Minnesota 2021).
“2005); Minn. Stat. § 572B.06(a) (“An agreement contained in a record to submit to arbitration any existing or subsequent controversy arising between the parties to the agreement is valid, enforceable and irrevocable except upon a ground that exists at law or in equity for the…”
— Minn. Stat. § 572B.06(b) — 4 cases
City of Rochester v. Kottschade, 896 N.W.2d 541 (Minn. 2017).
“*544 Following the hearing on the parties’ motions, the district court determined that the parties had an “enforceable agreement to arbitrate and that the disputes raised fall within the scope” of the agreement, see Minnesota Statutes § 572B.06(b) (2016). The court granted SJC’s…”
Byars v. Dart Transit Co. (M.D. Tenn. 2019).
“Minn Stat. § 572B.06. Notwithstanding this objective evidence of her assent to arbitration, Plaintiff contends that the arbitration agreements she signed are invalid and unenforceable because (1) the potential arbitrator pool and arbitration rules are biased in favor of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.