Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 572B.08 (2026)

Provisional Remedies

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Before an arbitrator is appointed and is authorized and able to act, the court, upon motion of a party to an arbitration proceeding and for good cause shown, may enter an order for provisional remedies to protect the effectiveness of the arbitration proceeding to the same extent and under the same conditions as if the controversy were the subject of a civil action.

(b) After an arbitrator is appointed and is authorized and able to act, the arbitrator may issue such orders for provisional remedies, including interim awards, as the arbitrator finds necessary to protect the effectiveness of the arbitration proceeding and to promote the fair and expeditious resolution of the controversy, to the same extent and under the same conditions as if the controversy were the subject of a civil action. After an arbitrator is appointed and is authorized and able to act, a party to an arbitration proceeding may move the court for a provisional remedy only if the matter is urgent and the arbitrator is not able to act in a timely manner or if the arbitrator cannot provide an adequate remedy.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2023 · leading case: Comput. Forensic Servs., Inc. v. BraunHagey & Borden LLC (D. Minnesota 2023).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Comput. Forensic Servs., Inc. v. BraunHagey & Borden LLC (D. Minnesota 2023). · cites it 2× “” Minn. Stat. § 572B.08(a). The Court agrees that a provisional remedy is necessary in this case to preserve the status quo and protect the effectiveness of arbitration.”

Bemidji Twp. v. City of Bemidji, N. Twp. (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Given the unique procedural history of this case, it would be illogical for us to conclude that the City waived its right to enforce an arbitration award via action taken after the arbitration process had already run its course.”

— Minn. Stat. § 572B.08(a) — 1 case

Comput. Forensic Servs., Inc. v. BraunHagey & Borden LLC (D. Minnesota 2023). “” Minn. Stat. § 572B.08(a). The Court agrees that a provisional remedy is necessary in this case to preserve the status quo and protect the effectiveness of arbitration.”

— Minn. Stat. § 572B.08(c) — 1 case

Bemidji Twp. v. City of Bemidji, N. Twp. (Minn. Ct. App. 2015). “Given the unique procedural history of this case, it would be illogical for us to conclude that the City waived its right to enforce an arbitration award via action taken after the arbitration process had already run its course.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.