Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 572B. UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 572B.30 (2026)

Savings Clause

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 572B.01 to 572B.31 do not affect an action or proceeding commenced or right accrued before sections 572B.01 to 572B.31 take effect.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2013–2016 · leading case: Seagate Tech., LLC v. W. Digit. Corp., Sining Mao, 854 N.W.2d 750 (Minn. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Seagate Tech., LLC v. W. Digit. Corp., Sining Mao, 854 N.W.2d 750 (Minn. 2014). · cites it 4× “See Minn. Stat. § 572B.30 (2012) (providing that sections 572B.”
Seagate Tech., LLC v. W. Digit. Corp., 834 N.W.2d 555 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 572B.30 (2012) (providing that “[sjections 572B.”
Seagate Tech., LLC v. W. Digit. Corp., Sining Mao (Minn. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “1 (citing Minn. Stat. § 572B.30 (2012), which provides that the provisions in section 572B are inapplicable to an arbitration that began before August 1, 2011).”
Jeffrey M. Davies v. Waterstone Capital Mgmt., L. P. (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “The MRUAA generally became effective August 1, 2011, but it includes a savings clause that precludes its application to “an action or proceedings commenced or right accrued before [the MRUAA took] effect.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.